Spinoff Tracker

Every US corporate spin-off, sourced from the filing that proves it.

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO GE → GE Vernova Inc. GEV

Distribution2024-04-02
Return+583.46%
ParentGENERAL ELECTRIC CO GE
SpincoGE Vernova Inc. GEV
StatusCompleted
StructureSpin-off A filing states a pro-rata distribution: holders receive shares automatically.
FocusFocus-increasing Parent and spinco operate in different industries — the class the research associates with stronger post-separation returns.
Ratio1 GE Vernova share for every 4 GE shares
Checked against EDGAR2026-08-22

Data trap

Two things that look like traps and are not, plus one that is. GE now operates as GE Aerospace, but it never legally renamed: the registrant is still General Electric Company and the ticker is still GE, so a parent price series is continuous across the separation and does not need re-keying. The real trap is timing — this distribution took effect at 12:10 a.m. Eastern, before the open, so April 2 is itself the first regular-way session rather than a when-issued one. That is the opposite of the GE HealthCare separation fifteen months earlier.

The restated filings have landed; this is kept as history.

Catalyst clock

  1. 2021-11-09Separation announced
  2. 2024-02-15Form 10 filed
  3. 2024-03-05Form 10 last amended
  4. 2024-03-08Form 10 effective
  5. 2024-03-19Record date
  6. When-issued trading opens
  7. 2024-04-02Distribution
  8. 2024-04-25First standalone earnings
  9. Index inclusion announced

Performance since separation

GE Vernova Inc. since separation+583.46%
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO over the same window+155.27%
S&P 500 (SPY) over the same window+47.58%
Russell 2000 (IWM) over the same window+46.69%
Excess over the S&P 500+535.88%
Excess over the Russell 2000+536.77%

Measured from the first regular-way close on or after the distribution — 2024-04-02 at 140.00 — to 2026-08-21 at 956.85. Window: 2.4 years. Two benchmarks, because one is misleading: spin-offs are usually small companies, and across this period small caps lagged the S&P by several points a year on their own. Measured against the S&P alone, roughly a third of any shortfall is company size rather than the separation. Returns are arithmetic over end-of-day closing prices. Unlike every other figure on this page, they do not come from a filing.

Pre-distribution investor return

Parent, announcement to separation+101.93%
Combined (GENERAL ELECTRIC CO + GE Vernova Inc.), pre-distribution to now+320.12%
Combined excess over the S&P 500+273.48%
Combined excess over the Russell 2000+276.13%

Combined treats a pre-spin holding as 1 GE Vernova share for every 4 GE shares valued at the parent's last close before regular post-spin trading resumed — 2024-04-01 at 139.86 — against that same basket today. That baseline is a practical proxy, not an attempt to isolate exactly how much value the separation transferred: for a large parent and a small spinco, ordinary day-to-day price noise can be bigger than the transfer itself. Run-up measures only the parent's own price, from the announcement date to that same baseline — how far the market had already moved before the separation's mechanics ever happened.

Filings

Every fact on this page comes from one of these.

Notes

The second leg of GE's three-way split, separating power and energy equipment and leaving GE as an aerospace company. Left unclassified: EDGAR gives parent and spinco the same generic electrical-equipment code, so the Desai and Jain two-digit test scores this as non-focus-increasing, while the businesses — jet engines against turbines and grid equipment — plainly are not the same industry. The code and the substance disagree, and this site does not resolve that by guessing. Classified focus_increasing: GE Vernova is described as a power/renewables company (7,000 gas turbines, ~55,000 wind turbines, ~30% of world electricity generated) while GE Aerospace keeps jet and defense engines — plainly different industries despite both entities sharing SIC 3600 on EDGAR, the exact code-versus-substance mismatch this site's methodology exists to catch. Unlike most deals in this dataset, GE Vernova was not levered up to fund a dividend to the parent — it received roughly a $2.0 billion cash contribution FROM GE, leaving it debt-light (~$129 million total debt, essentially unchanged pro forma) rather than debt-funded.