Spinoff Tracker

Every US corporate spin-off, sourced from the filing that proves it.

Safe & Green Holdings Corp. SGBX → Safe and Green Development Corporation RENX

Distribution2023-09-27
Returnprice history starts after the separation
ParentSafe & Green Holdings Corp. SGBX
SpincoSafe and Green Development Corporation RENX
StatusCompleted
StructureSpin-off A filing states a pro-rata distribution: holders receive shares automatically.
FocusNot focus-increasing Parent and spinco remain in the same industry; the separation divides scale rather than business.
Ratio0.930886 Safe and Green Development shares for every 5 Safe & Green Holdings shares
Ratio noteCovers only the roughly 30 percent distributed; the parent retained about 70 percent.
Parent retains70%
Checked against EDGAR2026-08-22

Data trap

Three departures from the usual template. Only about 30 percent was distributed, so the parent kept control and the free float was a fraction of the share count. The distribution was expressly taxable to holders rather than a tax-free separation. And both companies have since renamed — the spinco to RenX Enterprises and the parent to Olenox Industries — so neither name nor ticker from the filings resolves today, and only the CIKs are stable.

The restated filings have landed; this is kept as history.

Catalyst clock

  1. Separation announced
  2. 2022-12-23Form 10 filed
  3. 2023-09-12Form 10 last amended
  4. 2023-09-18Form 10 effective
  5. 2023-09-08Record date
  6. 2023-09-19When-issued trading opens
  7. 2023-09-27Distribution
  8. 2023-11-14First standalone earnings
  9. Index inclusion announced

Performance since separation

Safe and Green Development Corporation since separationprice history starts after the separation
Safe & Green Holdings Corp. over the same windowno window — the spinco is unpriced
S&P 500 (SPY) over the same windowno window — the spinco is unpriced
Russell 2000 (IWM) over the same windowno window — the spinco is unpriced
Excess over the S&P 500
Excess over the Russell 2000

Two benchmarks, because one is misleading: spin-offs are usually small companies, and across this period small caps lagged the S&P by several points a year on their own. Measured against the S&P alone, roughly a third of any shortfall is company size rather than the separation. Returns are arithmetic over end-of-day closing prices. Unlike every other figure on this page, they do not come from a filing.

Filings

Every fact on this page comes from one of these.

Notes

Safe & Green Holdings' partial distribution of its real estate development subsidiary, retaining about seventy percent. No price series is available for this spinco under its current ticker, so the return is recorded as an honest gap rather than estimated. Left unclassified: the parent is filed under construction materials wholesaling and the spinco under refuse systems, codes that describe neither business. Classified non_focus_increasing: despite the filing's 'Distinct Focus' framing, SG DevCo's own risk factors describe a vertically-integrated customer-supplier relationship rather than a change of industry — SG DevCo intends to build its developments almost exclusively using modules from SG Holdings' SG Echo subsidiary, and its growth is explicitly capacity-constrained by SG Echo's backlog. Only ~30% of shares were actually distributed; SG Holdings retained ~70% and SG DevCo remains a Nasdaq controlled company. The $4.2 million intercompany note was mostly forgiven ($4.0 million) as part of the separation.